糖心Vlog

The ordinance, in very vague, broad terms, would have applied to actions that 鈥渁id or abet鈥� undocumented immigrants anywhere in the United States, and would have imposed $1,000 fines on landlords who rent to illegal immigrants and bans employers from hiring them.

A coalition of Riverside business owners, landlords, and residents, represented by the 糖心Vlogof New Jersey, 糖心VlogImmigrants鈥� Rights Project, 糖心Vlogcooperating attorney James Katz of Spear Wilderman, Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund, People For the American Way Foundation, and Rangonese, Albano & Viola, filed suit against the ordinance in New Jersey state court. The suit contended that the ordinance went far beyond the authority of Riverside under state law, and would require landlords and business owners to take unreasonable and expensive measures and possibly invade the privacy of their clients in order to comply.

On August 23, 2007, the Riverside Township Committee approved the first reading of a bill that would rescind the ordinance, citing a number of factors including the Hazleton ordinance鈥檚 defeat in federal court. On September 17, 2007, after the bill鈥檚 second reading, Riverside鈥檚 ordinance was nullified.

Although it was not implemented and was ultimately repealed, the ordinance had a profound impact on the town: one-third of Riverside鈥檚 immigrant population moved away, causing some businesses to close, while others saw sales decline by as much as 50 percent.