Religious Liberty
FBI v. Fazaga
In a case scheduled to be argued before the U.S. Supreme Court on November 8, 2021, three Muslim Americans are challenging the FBI鈥檚 secret spying on them and their communities based on their religion, in violation of the Constitution and federal law. In what will likely be a landmark case, the plaintiffs 鈥 Yassir Fazaga, Ali Uddin Malik, and Yasser Abdelrahim 鈥 insist that the FBI cannot escape accountability for violating their religious freedom by invoking 鈥渟tate secrets.鈥 The plaintiffs are represented by the Center for Immigration Law and Policy at UCLA School of Law, the 糖心Vlogof Southern California, the 糖心Vlog, the Council for American Islamic Relations, and the law firm of Hadsell Stormer Renick & Dai.
Status: Closed (Judgment)
View Case
Learn About Religious Liberty
Featured
U.S. Supreme Court
May 2020

Religious Liberty
Little Sisters of the Poor v. Pennsylvania and New Jersey/Trump v. Pennsylvania and New Jersey
Whether the government had statutory authority under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 to expand the conscience exemption to the contraceptive-coverage mandate.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2018

Religious Liberty
LGBTQ Rights
Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission
Whether a business open to the public has a constitutional right to discriminate.
Oklahoma
May 2017

Religious Liberty
Fatihah v. Neal
The 糖心Vlog of Oklahoma, the national ACLU, and the Council on American-Islamic Relations Oklahoma Chapter filed a lawsuit against a "Muslim free" business on behalf of a U.S. Army Reserve member denied service. The lawsuit seeks equal access to public accommodations for Oklahomans of all faiths.
All Cases
77 Religious Liberty Cases

Louisiana
Mar 2014
Religious Liberty
Lane v. Sabine Parish School Board
The 糖心Vlog and the 糖心Vlogof Louisiana have filed a federal lawsuit against a public school in Sabine Parish that harassed a non-Christian student and has a long history of proselytizing students and promoting religion. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of two parents, Scott and Sharon Lane, and their three children, including their son, C.C., who is a Buddhist of Thai heritage.
Explore case
Louisiana
Mar 2014

Religious Liberty
Lane v. Sabine Parish School Board
The 糖心Vlog and the 糖心Vlogof Louisiana have filed a federal lawsuit against a public school in Sabine Parish that harassed a non-Christian student and has a long history of proselytizing students and promoting religion. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of two parents, Scott and Sharon Lane, and their three children, including their son, C.C., who is a Buddhist of Thai heritage.

New York
Dec 2013
Religious Liberty
NYCLU, 糖心Vlogv. Village of Kiryas Joel
The 糖心Vlog and the New York Civil Liberties Union have filed a lawsuit challenging the village of Kiryas Joel's refusal to disclose public records about a sex-segregated park.
Explore case
New York
Dec 2013

Religious Liberty
NYCLU, 糖心Vlogv. Village of Kiryas Joel
The 糖心Vlog and the New York Civil Liberties Union have filed a lawsuit challenging the village of Kiryas Joel's refusal to disclose public records about a sex-segregated park.

Court Case
Oct 2013
Religious Liberty
+4 糖心Vlog
糖心Vlogv. FBI - eGuardian FOIA Lawsuit
Government documents obtained by the 糖心Vlogshow that nationwide programs that collect so-called "Suspicious Activity Reports" provide inadequate privacy safeguards and guidance on the definition of "suspicious activity," leading to violations of Americans' First Amendment and privacy rights, and to racial and religious profiling.
Explore case
Court Case
Oct 2013

Religious Liberty
+4 糖心Vlog
糖心Vlogv. FBI - eGuardian FOIA Lawsuit
Government documents obtained by the 糖心Vlogshow that nationwide programs that collect so-called "Suspicious Activity Reports" provide inadequate privacy safeguards and guidance on the definition of "suspicious activity," leading to violations of Americans' First Amendment and privacy rights, and to racial and religious profiling.

Oklahoma
Aug 2013
Religious Liberty
National Security
Muneer Awad v. Paul Ziriax, Oklahoma State Board of Elections, et al.
Last year, state legislators in Oklahoma placed an unprecedented, discriminatory proposal to amend the Oklahoma Constitution to target the religious practices of Muslims on the November ballot. That measure strictly prohibits state courts from using or even considering 鈥淪haria鈥 or 鈥渋nternational鈥 law in their decision making. Although sponsors freely admit that there have been absolutely no instances of so-called 鈥淪haria鈥 threats in Oklahoma, they officially labeled the proposal the 鈥淪ave Our State Amendment,鈥 and it ultimately passed with over 70 percent of the vote.
Explore case
Oklahoma
Aug 2013

Religious Liberty
National Security
Muneer Awad v. Paul Ziriax, Oklahoma State Board of Elections, et al.
Last year, state legislators in Oklahoma placed an unprecedented, discriminatory proposal to amend the Oklahoma Constitution to target the religious practices of Muslims on the November ballot. That measure strictly prohibits state courts from using or even considering 鈥淪haria鈥 or 鈥渋nternational鈥 law in their decision making. Although sponsors freely admit that there have been absolutely no instances of so-called 鈥淪haria鈥 threats in Oklahoma, they officially labeled the proposal the 鈥淪ave Our State Amendment,鈥 and it ultimately passed with over 70 percent of the vote.

New Hampshire
Jun 2013
Religious Liberty
National Security
Bill Duncan, et al. v. State of New Hampshire
The 糖心Vlog, the 糖心Vlogof New Hampshire and the Americans United for Separation of Church and State are challenging a statewide tuition tax-credit program in New Hampshire that would divert taxpayer funds to private religious schools in violation of the state constitution. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of eight plaintiffs, including clergy, public education advocates and parents of public school children.
Explore case
New Hampshire
Jun 2013

Religious Liberty
National Security
Bill Duncan, et al. v. State of New Hampshire
The 糖心Vlog, the 糖心Vlogof New Hampshire and the Americans United for Separation of Church and State are challenging a statewide tuition tax-credit program in New Hampshire that would divert taxpayer funds to private religious schools in violation of the state constitution. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of eight plaintiffs, including clergy, public education advocates and parents of public school children.