Smart Justice
Singleton v. Cannizzaro
The ÌÇÐÄVlogTrone Center for Justice and Equality, ÌÇÐÄVlogof Louisiana, and Civil Rights Corps, filed suit against District Attorney Leon Cannizzaro, his office in Orleans Parish, Louisiana, and several Assistant District Attorneys for systematically breaking the laws of Louisiana and of the U.S. Constitution.
View Case
Learn About Smart Justice
Featured
Mississippi
Mar 2017

Smart Justice
Prisoners' Rights
Dockery v. Hall
The ACLU, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), the Law Offices of Elizabeth Alexander, and the law firm of Covington & Burling LLP, filed a petition for class certification and expert reports for a federal lawsuit on behalf of prisoners at the East Mississippi Correctional Facility (EMCF). The lawsuit, which was filed in May 2013, describes the for-profit prison as hyper-violent, grotesquely filthy and dangerous. EMCF is operated "in a perpetual state of crisis" where prisoners are at "grave risk of death and loss of limbs." The facility, located in Meridian, Mississippi, is supposed to provide intensive treatment to the state's prisoners with serious psychiatric disabilities, many of whom are locked down in long-term solitary confinement.
All Cases
191 Smart Justice Cases

U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2011
Smart Justice
Prisoners' Rights
Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Burlington
Whether a jail policy of strip searching every new detainee violates the Fourth Amendment.
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2011

Smart Justice
Prisoners' Rights
Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Burlington
Whether a jail policy of strip searching every new detainee violates the Fourth Amendment.

U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2011
Smart Justice
+2 ÌÇÐÄVlog
J.D.B. v. North Carolina
Whether a child's age may be considered as part of the totality of circumstances in determining whether a suspect is in custody and must therefore be given Miranda warnings prior to any police interrogation.
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2011

Smart Justice
+2 ÌÇÐÄVlog
J.D.B. v. North Carolina
Whether a child's age may be considered as part of the totality of circumstances in determining whether a suspect is in custody and must therefore be given Miranda warnings prior to any police interrogation.

U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2011
Smart Justice
+2 ÌÇÐÄVlog
Flores-Villar v. United States
Whether the government may constitutionally make it more difficult for citizen fathers than citizen mothers to transmit citizenship to their out-of-wedlock children born outside the U.S.
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2011

Smart Justice
+2 ÌÇÐÄVlog
Flores-Villar v. United States
Whether the government may constitutionally make it more difficult for citizen fathers than citizen mothers to transmit citizenship to their out-of-wedlock children born outside the U.S.

U.S. Supreme Court
May 2011
Smart Justice
+2 ÌÇÐÄVlog
Maples v. Thomas
Whether the defendant's failure to file a timely appeal in state court should bar all subsequent federal court review of his death sentence when the reason for the missed deadline was that Alabama officials made no effort to inform him of an adverse decision from the state courts after it was returned unopened by his lawyers' former law firm.
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
May 2011

Smart Justice
+2 ÌÇÐÄVlog
Maples v. Thomas
Whether the defendant's failure to file a timely appeal in state court should bar all subsequent federal court review of his death sentence when the reason for the missed deadline was that Alabama officials made no effort to inform him of an adverse decision from the state courts after it was returned unopened by his lawyers' former law firm.

U.S. Supreme Court
May 2011
Smart Justice
Prisoners' Rights
Brown v. Plata
Whether a federal court appropriately exercised its authority by ordering the State of California to reduce the size of its prison population, which was more than double the system’s intended capacity, after dozens of remedial orders had failed for more than a decade to ensure that California prisoners received constitutionally adequate medical and mental health care.
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
May 2011

Smart Justice
Prisoners' Rights
Brown v. Plata
Whether a federal court appropriately exercised its authority by ordering the State of California to reduce the size of its prison population, which was more than double the system’s intended capacity, after dozens of remedial orders had failed for more than a decade to ensure that California prisoners received constitutionally adequate medical and mental health care.