Free Speech
Students for Justice in Palestine at the University of Florida v. Raymond Rodrigues
The University of Florida chapter of Students for Justice in Palestine filed a lawsuit on November 16, 2023, challenging the Chancellor of the State University System of Florida鈥檚 order to state universities to deactivate the student group. This order threatens the students鈥� constitutionally-protected right to free speech and association in violation of the First Amendment. The 糖心Vlogand its partners are seeking a preliminary injunction that would bar the Chancellor and the University of Florida from deactivating the UF SJP.
Status: Ongoing
View Case
Learn About Free Speech
Featured
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2023
Free Speech
Molina v. Book
Whether police officers violated clearly established First Amendment rights when they tear-gassed plaintiffs for serving as legal observers in a public protest.
U.S. Supreme Court
Aug 2023
Free Speech
O鈥機onnor-Ratcliff v. Garnier and Lindke v. Freed
The ACLU, the 糖心Vlogof Northern California, and the 糖心Vlogof Southern California filed amicus briefs in support of everyday people fighting for government transparency and accountability in two cases set for review by the U.S. Supreme Court this Term: O鈥機onnor-Ratcliff v. Garnier and Lindke v. Freed.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2021
Free Speech
Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L.
On September 25, 2017, the ACLU-PA filed suit on behalf of B.L., a high school sophomore who has been cheerleading since she was in fifth grade and was expelled from the team as punishment for out-of-school speech.
All Cases
150 Free Speech Cases
U.S. Supreme Court
Nov 2011
Free Speech
FCC v. Fox Television
Whether the FCC's censorship of "indecent" speech on broadcast radio and television is unconstitutional?
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Nov 2011
Free Speech
FCC v. Fox Television
Whether the FCC's censorship of "indecent" speech on broadcast radio and television is unconstitutional?
U.S. Supreme Court
Oct 2011
Free Speech
Golan v. Holder
Whether the government may extend copyright protection to expressive material — including books, music, and movies — that was previously available in the public domain.
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Oct 2011
Free Speech
Golan v. Holder
Whether the government may extend copyright protection to expressive material — including books, music, and movies — that was previously available in the public domain.
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2011
Free Speech
Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories
Whether the challenged patents in this case violate both patent law and the First Amendment because they reach abstract ideas and pure thought.
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2011
Free Speech
Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories
Whether the challenged patents in this case violate both patent law and the First Amendment because they reach abstract ideas and pure thought.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2011
Free Speech
Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri
Whether the First Amendment's guarantee of a right to petition the government for redress of grievances protects a public employee against retaliation for bringing an employment-related lawsuit against his public employer.
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2011
Free Speech
Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri
Whether the First Amendment's guarantee of a right to petition the government for redress of grievances protects a public employee against retaliation for bringing an employment-related lawsuit against his public employer.
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2010
Free Speech
Fox v. Vice
Whether a defendant can recover attorney's fees under a federal fee-shifting statute absent a showing that the entire lawsuit is frivolous and, if so, whether the defendant must at least show that any frivolous claims are factually distinct from non-frivolous claims.
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2010
Free Speech
Fox v. Vice
Whether a defendant can recover attorney's fees under a federal fee-shifting statute absent a showing that the entire lawsuit is frivolous and, if so, whether the defendant must at least show that any frivolous claims are factually distinct from non-frivolous claims.