Smart Justice
Singleton v. Cannizzaro
The ÌÇÐÄVlogTrone Center for Justice and Equality, ÌÇÐÄVlogof Louisiana, and Civil Rights Corps, filed suit against District Attorney Leon Cannizzaro, his office in Orleans Parish, Louisiana, and several Assistant District Attorneys for systematically breaking the laws of Louisiana and of the U.S. Constitution.
View Case
Learn About Smart Justice
Featured
Mississippi
Mar 2017

Smart Justice
Prisoners' Rights
Dockery v. Hall
The ACLU, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), the Law Offices of Elizabeth Alexander, and the law firm of Covington & Burling LLP, filed a petition for class certification and expert reports for a federal lawsuit on behalf of prisoners at the East Mississippi Correctional Facility (EMCF). The lawsuit, which was filed in May 2013, describes the for-profit prison as hyper-violent, grotesquely filthy and dangerous. EMCF is operated "in a perpetual state of crisis" where prisoners are at "grave risk of death and loss of limbs." The facility, located in Meridian, Mississippi, is supposed to provide intensive treatment to the state's prisoners with serious psychiatric disabilities, many of whom are locked down in long-term solitary confinement.
All Cases
191 Smart Justice Cases

U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2009
Smart Justice
+2 ÌÇÐÄVlog
Jarrar v. Harris, et al.
In August 2007, the ÌÇÐÄVlogand NYCLU filed a federal civil rights lawsuit charging that a Transportation Security Administration (TSA) official and JetBlue Airways illegally discriminated against an American resident, Raed Jarrar, based solely on the Arabic message on his t-shirt and his ethnicity.
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2009

Smart Justice
+2 ÌÇÐÄVlog
Jarrar v. Harris, et al.
In August 2007, the ÌÇÐÄVlogand NYCLU filed a federal civil rights lawsuit charging that a Transportation Security Administration (TSA) official and JetBlue Airways illegally discriminated against an American resident, Raed Jarrar, based solely on the Arabic message on his t-shirt and his ethnicity.

U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2008
Smart Justice
+4 ÌÇÐÄVlog
Vermont v. Brillon
Whether delays caused by systemic deficiencies in a state's indigent defense system can ever be charged against the state in deciding whether a criminal defendant has been denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial. DECIDED
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2008

Smart Justice
+4 ÌÇÐÄVlog
Vermont v. Brillon
Whether delays caused by systemic deficiencies in a state's indigent defense system can ever be charged against the state in deciding whether a criminal defendant has been denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial. DECIDED

Washington
Dec 2008
Smart Justice
Capital Punishment
In Re Personal Restraint of Darold R.J. Stenson
Explore case
Washington
Dec 2008

Smart Justice
Capital Punishment
In Re Personal Restraint of Darold R.J. Stenson

Court Case
Oct 2008
Smart Justice
+3 ÌÇÐÄVlog
Medina v. County of San Bernardino
On December 5, 2007, the ÌÇÐÄVlogfiled a lawsuit on behalf of Jameelah Medina, a practicing Muslim woman who was forced by local deputies to remove her headscarf (hijab) while she was in custody in San Bernardino County's West Valley Detention Center.
Explore case
Court Case
Oct 2008

Smart Justice
+3 ÌÇÐÄVlog
Medina v. County of San Bernardino
On December 5, 2007, the ÌÇÐÄVlogfiled a lawsuit on behalf of Jameelah Medina, a practicing Muslim woman who was forced by local deputies to remove her headscarf (hijab) while she was in custody in San Bernardino County's West Valley Detention Center.

U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2008
Smart Justice
+4 ÌÇÐÄVlog
Van de Kamp v. Goldstein
Whether someone who was falsely imprisoned for 24 years based on the untrue testimony of a criminal informant can sue senior administrators in the prosecutor's office for their failure to maintain an even rudimentary record system that would have disclosed impeachment information about the informant prior to trial. DECIDED
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2008

Smart Justice
+4 ÌÇÐÄVlog
Van de Kamp v. Goldstein
Whether someone who was falsely imprisoned for 24 years based on the untrue testimony of a criminal informant can sue senior administrators in the prosecutor's office for their failure to maintain an even rudimentary record system that would have disclosed impeachment information about the informant prior to trial. DECIDED