Criminal Law Reform
Featured
Arizona
Oct 2023

Criminal Law Reform
Racial Justice
Fund for Empowerment v. Phoenix, City of
Fund for Empowerment is a challenge to the City of Phoenix’s practice of conducting sweeps of encampments without notice, issuing citations to unsheltered people for camping and sleeping on public property when they have no place else to go, and confiscating and destroying their property without notice or process.
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2023

Criminal Law Reform
McElrath v. Georgia
Does the Double Jeopardy Clause bar an appellate court from reviewing and setting aside a jury’s verdicts of acquittal on the ground that the verdict is inconsistent with the jury’s verdict on other charges?
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2023

Criminal Law Reform
Pulsifer v. United States
This case involves the interpretation of a federal law that allows defendants to avoid mandatory minimum sentences for certain nonviolent drug crimes, allowing judges to impose sentences tailored to their individual circumstances.
Texas
Jul 2021

Criminal Law Reform
Prisoners' Rights
Sanchez et al v. Dallas County Sheriff et al
Decarceration has always been an emergency, a life and death proposition, but COVID-19 makes this effort intensely urgent. The ÌÇÐÄVloghas been working with our partners to litigate for the rights of those who are incarcerated and cannot protect themselves because of the policies of the institutions in which they are jailed.
All Cases
144 Criminal Law Reform Cases

U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2007
Criminal Law Reform
+2 ÌÇÐÄVlog
Brendlin v. California
Reviewing whether a car's passenger can challenge an illegal traffic stop under the Fourth Amendment. DECIDED
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2007

Criminal Law Reform
+2 ÌÇÐÄVlog
Brendlin v. California
Reviewing whether a car's passenger can challenge an illegal traffic stop under the Fourth Amendment. DECIDED

Court Case
Apr 2007
Criminal Law Reform
+4 ÌÇÐÄVlog
In Re Spears
Defending juveniles' pre-trial right to counsel in Ohio.
Explore case
Court Case
Apr 2007

Criminal Law Reform
+4 ÌÇÐÄVlog
In Re Spears
Defending juveniles' pre-trial right to counsel in Ohio.

U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2007
Criminal Law Reform
+2 ÌÇÐÄVlog
Scott v. Harris
Reviewing whether, and under what circumstances, a law enforcement may claim qualified immunity from damages after ramming the plaintiff's car during a high speed chase that left the plaintiff severely crippled. DECIDED
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2007

Criminal Law Reform
+2 ÌÇÐÄVlog
Scott v. Harris
Reviewing whether, and under what circumstances, a law enforcement may claim qualified immunity from damages after ramming the plaintiff's car during a high speed chase that left the plaintiff severely crippled. DECIDED

Ohio
Mar 2006
Criminal Law Reform
+4 ÌÇÐÄVlog
J.P. v. Taft
Protecting incarcerated juveniles' access to the courts in Ohio.
Explore case
Ohio
Mar 2006

Criminal Law Reform
+4 ÌÇÐÄVlog
J.P. v. Taft
Protecting incarcerated juveniles' access to the courts in Ohio.

U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2006
Criminal Law Reform
+2 ÌÇÐÄVlog
Hudson v. Michigan
Reviewing whether the exclusionary rule applies to evidence seized following a violation of the "knock-and-announce" rule. DECIDED
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2006

Criminal Law Reform
+2 ÌÇÐÄVlog
Hudson v. Michigan
Reviewing whether the exclusionary rule applies to evidence seized following a violation of the "knock-and-announce" rule. DECIDED