Free Speech
Students for Justice in Palestine at the University of Florida v. Raymond Rodrigues
The University of Florida chapter of Students for Justice in Palestine filed a lawsuit on November 16, 2023, challenging the Chancellor of the State University System of Florida’s order to state universities to deactivate the student group. This order threatens the students’ constitutionally-protected right to free speech and association in violation of the First Amendment. The ÌÇÐÄVlogand its partners are seeking a preliminary injunction that would bar the Chancellor and the University of Florida from deactivating the UF SJP.
Status: Ongoing
View Case
Learn About Free Speech
Featured
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2023

Free Speech
Molina v. Book
Whether police officers violated clearly established First Amendment rights when they tear-gassed plaintiffs for serving as legal observers in a public protest.
U.S. Supreme Court
Aug 2023

Free Speech
O’Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier and Lindke v. Freed
The ACLU, the ÌÇÐÄVlogof Northern California, and the ÌÇÐÄVlogof Southern California filed amicus briefs in support of everyday people fighting for government transparency and accountability in two cases set for review by the U.S. Supreme Court this Term: O’Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier and Lindke v. Freed.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2021

Free Speech
Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L.
On September 25, 2017, the ACLU-PA filed suit on behalf of B.L., a high school sophomore who has been cheerleading since she was in fifth grade and was expelled from the team as punishment for out-of-school speech.
All Cases
150 Free Speech Cases

U.S. Supreme Court
Apr 2009
Free Speech
FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.
Whether the FCC improperly reversed its position without adequate justification by recently holding that "fleeting expletives" represent "indecent" speech that can be banned from the airwaves. DECIDED
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Apr 2009

Free Speech
FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.
Whether the FCC improperly reversed its position without adequate justification by recently holding that "fleeting expletives" represent "indecent" speech that can be banned from the airwaves. DECIDED

U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2009
Free Speech
+2 ÌÇÐÄVlog
Jarrar v. Harris, et al.
In August 2007, the ÌÇÐÄVlogand NYCLU filed a federal civil rights lawsuit charging that a Transportation Security Administration (TSA) official and JetBlue Airways illegally discriminated against an American resident, Raed Jarrar, based solely on the Arabic message on his t-shirt and his ethnicity.
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2009

Free Speech
+2 ÌÇÐÄVlog
Jarrar v. Harris, et al.
In August 2007, the ÌÇÐÄVlogand NYCLU filed a federal civil rights lawsuit charging that a Transportation Security Administration (TSA) official and JetBlue Airways illegally discriminated against an American resident, Raed Jarrar, based solely on the Arabic message on his t-shirt and his ethnicity.

U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2007
Free Speech
Morse v. Frederick
Whether school officials violated the First Amendment when they suspended a high school student for holding up a sign that the principal interpreted as a pro-drug message when the sign caused no disruption, was displayed at a public event on the public streets, and the student had not yet arrived at school for the day. DECIDED
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2007

Free Speech
Morse v. Frederick
Whether school officials violated the First Amendment when they suspended a high school student for holding up a sign that the principal interpreted as a pro-drug message when the sign caused no disruption, was displayed at a public event on the public streets, and the student had not yet arrived at school for the day. DECIDED

U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2007
Free Speech
Federal Election Commission v. Wisconsin Right to Life
Considering how groups, like the ACLU, can establish a First Amendment right to broadcast "genuine" issue ads in the period preceding an election despite a federal law ban on any broadcast ad that names a candidate for office regardless of the ads purpose or effect. DECIDED
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2007

Free Speech
Federal Election Commission v. Wisconsin Right to Life
Considering how groups, like the ACLU, can establish a First Amendment right to broadcast "genuine" issue ads in the period preceding an election despite a federal law ban on any broadcast ad that names a candidate for office regardless of the ads purpose or effect. DECIDED

U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2006
Free Speech
Randall v. Sorrell
Challenge to Vermont's campaign finance law and to the constitutionality of expenditure limits under the First Amendment. DECIDED
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2006

Free Speech
Randall v. Sorrell
Challenge to Vermont's campaign finance law and to the constitutionality of expenditure limits under the First Amendment. DECIDED