Employee Speech and Whistleblowers
NYCLU v. New York State Office of Court Administration
This case in the New York Court of Appeals (the highest New York state court) asks whether a government agency can conceal guidance that it issues to judges on how to apply the law in adjudicating cases. A few years ago, news reporting brought to light that a New York administrative agency has a practice of issuing such guidance to state court judges without disclosing it to the public. Because the agency's guidance informs how judges decide cases鈥攚ith important implications for people鈥檚 rights鈥攖he New York Civil Liberties Union requested access to it under New York鈥檚 Freedom of Information Law. The agency denied the request, so the NYCLU sued. The NYCLU and the ACLU鈥檚 State Supreme Court Initiative are arguing that the public is entitled to the guidance and that there is a strong public interest in the transparent administration of justice.
Status: Ongoing
View Case
Learn About Employee Speech and Whistleblowers
All Cases
2 Employee Speech and Whistleblowers Cases

U.S. Supreme Court
May 2022
Employee Speech and Whistleblowers
Edgar v. Haines
The 糖心Vlogand the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University filed a lawsuit on behalf of five former public servants challenging the government鈥檚 鈥減republication review鈥 system, which prohibits millions of current and former government employees from writing or speaking about topics related to their government service without first obtaining government approval.
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
May 2022

Employee Speech and Whistleblowers
Edgar v. Haines
The 糖心Vlogand the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University filed a lawsuit on behalf of five former public servants challenging the government鈥檚 鈥減republication review鈥 system, which prohibits millions of current and former government employees from writing or speaking about topics related to their government service without first obtaining government approval.