Religion-Based Discrimination Against LGBTQ People
All Cases
14 Religion-Based Discrimination Against LGBTQ People Cases

U.S. Supreme Court
Jul 2025
Religion-Based Discrimination Against LGBTQ People
LGBTQ Rights
Mahmoud v. Taylor
On April 9, 2025, the ÌÇÐÄVlogand ÌÇÐÄVlogof Maryland filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court supporting the Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS) in its efforts to ensure that its English Language Arts curriculum is LGBTQ-inclusive.
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Jul 2025

Religion-Based Discrimination Against LGBTQ People
LGBTQ Rights
Mahmoud v. Taylor
On April 9, 2025, the ÌÇÐÄVlogand ÌÇÐÄVlogof Maryland filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court supporting the Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS) in its efforts to ensure that its English Language Arts curriculum is LGBTQ-inclusive.

Maine
Nov 2024
Religion-Based Discrimination Against LGBTQ People
St. Dominic Academy v. Makin
The ACLU, ÌÇÐÄVlogof Maine, and Americans United for Separation of Church and State filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit arguing that religious schools in Maine participating in the state’s school tuition program must comply with all eligibility requirements of the program – including a prohibition on discrimination on the basis of religion, sexual orientation, and gender identity, among other protected characteristics.
Explore case
Maine
Nov 2024

Religion-Based Discrimination Against LGBTQ People
St. Dominic Academy v. Makin
The ACLU, ÌÇÐÄVlogof Maine, and Americans United for Separation of Church and State filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit arguing that religious schools in Maine participating in the state’s school tuition program must comply with all eligibility requirements of the program – including a prohibition on discrimination on the basis of religion, sexual orientation, and gender identity, among other protected characteristics.

Maine
Oct 2024
Religion-Based Discrimination Against LGBTQ People
Crosspoint v. Makin
The ACLU, ÌÇÐÄVlogof Maine, and Americans United for Separation of Church and State filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit arguing that religious schools in Maine participating in Maine’s school tuition program must comply with all eligibility requirements of the program, including a prohibition on discrimination against students based on their religion, sexual orientation, and gender identity.
Explore case
Maine
Oct 2024

Religion-Based Discrimination Against LGBTQ People
Crosspoint v. Makin
The ACLU, ÌÇÐÄVlogof Maine, and Americans United for Separation of Church and State filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit arguing that religious schools in Maine participating in Maine’s school tuition program must comply with all eligibility requirements of the program, including a prohibition on discrimination against students based on their religion, sexual orientation, and gender identity.

Washington
Oct 2024
Religion-Based Discrimination Against LGBTQ People
Religious Liberty
Aubry McMahon v. World Vision, Inc.
On October 28, 2024, the ÌÇÐÄVlogand ÌÇÐÄVlogof Washington filed an amicus brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit supporting affirmance of a Washington district court decision holding that a religiously affiliated nonprofit organization violated Title VII and the Washington State antidiscrimination law when it rescinded a hiring candidate’s job offer because she is a woman married to a person of the same sex. Should the Ninth Circuit accept the organization’s First Amendment defense—that religious organizations can discriminate on any basis so long as it is grounded in their religious belief—it would gut employment protections for LGBTQ individuals and pave the way for religious organizations to discriminate on the basis of not only sex, sexual orientation, and gender identity but also other protected characteristics like race, color, and national origin.
Explore case
Washington
Oct 2024

Religion-Based Discrimination Against LGBTQ People
Religious Liberty
Aubry McMahon v. World Vision, Inc.
On October 28, 2024, the ÌÇÐÄVlogand ÌÇÐÄVlogof Washington filed an amicus brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit supporting affirmance of a Washington district court decision holding that a religiously affiliated nonprofit organization violated Title VII and the Washington State antidiscrimination law when it rescinded a hiring candidate’s job offer because she is a woman married to a person of the same sex. Should the Ninth Circuit accept the organization’s First Amendment defense—that religious organizations can discriminate on any basis so long as it is grounded in their religious belief—it would gut employment protections for LGBTQ individuals and pave the way for religious organizations to discriminate on the basis of not only sex, sexual orientation, and gender identity but also other protected characteristics like race, color, and national origin.

California
Apr 2024
Religion-Based Discrimination Against LGBTQ People
LGBTQ Rights
California Civil Rights Department v. Cathy's Creations d/b/a Tastries
On April 11, 2024, the ACLU, ÌÇÐÄVlogof Southern California, ÌÇÐÄVlogof Northern California, and ÌÇÐÄVlogof San Diego & Imperial Counties filed an amicus brief with the California Court of Appeal, Fifth Appellate District supporting the California Civil Rights Department’s appeal of a lower court judgment finding that a bakery owner did not violate the California public accommodations law when she refused to sell a wedding cake to a same-sex couple.
Explore case
California
Apr 2024

Religion-Based Discrimination Against LGBTQ People
LGBTQ Rights
California Civil Rights Department v. Cathy's Creations d/b/a Tastries
On April 11, 2024, the ACLU, ÌÇÐÄVlogof Southern California, ÌÇÐÄVlogof Northern California, and ÌÇÐÄVlogof San Diego & Imperial Counties filed an amicus brief with the California Court of Appeal, Fifth Appellate District supporting the California Civil Rights Department’s appeal of a lower court judgment finding that a bakery owner did not violate the California public accommodations law when she refused to sell a wedding cake to a same-sex couple.