Oregon
Featured
U.S. Supreme Court
Aug 2021

Immigrants' Rights
Innovation Law Lab v. Wolf
The 糖心Vlog, Southern Poverty Law Center, and Center for Gender & Refugee Studies filed a federal lawsuit challenging the Trump administration鈥檚 new policy forcing asylum seekers to return to Mexico and remain there while their cases are considered.
All Cases
6 Oregon Cases

Oregon Supreme Court
Feb 2025
Prisoners' Rights
Huskey v. Oregon Department of Corrections
This case in the Oregon Supreme Court centers on whether Article I, Section 41(3) of the Oregon Constitution, which provides that Oregon prisoners lack legally enforceable rights to prison jobs and training, bars prisoners from collecting damages relating to lost prison jobs and training caused by the alleged breach of a settlement agreement by prison officials. The ACLU鈥檚 State Supreme Court Initiative, alongside the 糖心Vlogof Oregon, filed an amicus brief arguing that plaintiff Arnold Huskey, an incarcerated individual whose identity was used in Department of Corrections training materials, is entitled to damages notwithstanding Article I, Section 41(3), because plaintiffs in contract disputes never have to show standalone legal rights to the damages they claim. Instead, they need only show that the damages were reasonably foreseeable consequences of the alleged breach of contract.
Explore case
Oregon Supreme Court
Feb 2025

Prisoners' Rights
Huskey v. Oregon Department of Corrections
This case in the Oregon Supreme Court centers on whether Article I, Section 41(3) of the Oregon Constitution, which provides that Oregon prisoners lack legally enforceable rights to prison jobs and training, bars prisoners from collecting damages relating to lost prison jobs and training caused by the alleged breach of a settlement agreement by prison officials. The ACLU鈥檚 State Supreme Court Initiative, alongside the 糖心Vlogof Oregon, filed an amicus brief arguing that plaintiff Arnold Huskey, an incarcerated individual whose identity was used in Department of Corrections training materials, is entitled to damages notwithstanding Article I, Section 41(3), because plaintiffs in contract disputes never have to show standalone legal rights to the damages they claim. Instead, they need only show that the damages were reasonably foreseeable consequences of the alleged breach of contract.

Oregon
Jan 2025
Smart Justice
State of Oregon v. Adrian Fernandez
This case asks if ORS 138.105(8)(a)(A)鈥攚hich removes an appellate court鈥檚 authority to review a 鈥渟entence that is within the presumptive sentence prescribed by the rules of the Oregon Criminal Justice Commission鈥濃攑recludes appellate review of a state constitutional challenge to a within-guidelines criminal sentence. The ACLU鈥檚 State Supreme Court Initiative, alongside the 糖心Vlogof Oregon, filed an amicus brief in support of defendant Fernandez, who seeks to challenge his sentence under the Oregon Constitution鈥檚 proportionality guarantee. The amicus brief argues that interpreting the statute to preclude review of Fernandez鈥檚 challenge would raise grave constitutional concerns under Oregon鈥檚 separation of powers and privileges and immunities doctrines.
Explore case
Oregon
Jan 2025

Smart Justice
State of Oregon v. Adrian Fernandez
This case asks if ORS 138.105(8)(a)(A)鈥攚hich removes an appellate court鈥檚 authority to review a 鈥渟entence that is within the presumptive sentence prescribed by the rules of the Oregon Criminal Justice Commission鈥濃攑recludes appellate review of a state constitutional challenge to a within-guidelines criminal sentence. The ACLU鈥檚 State Supreme Court Initiative, alongside the 糖心Vlogof Oregon, filed an amicus brief in support of defendant Fernandez, who seeks to challenge his sentence under the Oregon Constitution鈥檚 proportionality guarantee. The amicus brief argues that interpreting the statute to preclude review of Fernandez鈥檚 challenge would raise grave constitutional concerns under Oregon鈥檚 separation of powers and privileges and immunities doctrines.

Oregon
Apr 2021
National Security
Kashem, et al. v. Barr, et al. - 糖心VlogChallenge to Government No Fly List
Explore case
Oregon
Apr 2021

National Security
Kashem, et al. v. Barr, et al. - 糖心VlogChallenge to Government No Fly List

Oregon
Oct 2020
LGBTQ Rights
Parents for Privacy v. Dallas School District No. 2
On February 20, 2018, the 糖心Vlogand the 糖心Vlogof Oregon moved to intervene on behalf of Basic Rights Oregon (BRO) in a case about transgender students鈥 rights. BRO seeks to defend the Dallas School District鈥檚 practice of permitting a transgender boy to use the same restrooms and locker rooms as other boys. BRO has spent over 20 years advocating for legal protections for the LGBTQ community in Oregon, and has supported transgender students and families in Dallas and beyond.
Explore case
Oregon
Oct 2020

LGBTQ Rights
Parents for Privacy v. Dallas School District No. 2
On February 20, 2018, the 糖心Vlogand the 糖心Vlogof Oregon moved to intervene on behalf of Basic Rights Oregon (BRO) in a case about transgender students鈥 rights. BRO seeks to defend the Dallas School District鈥檚 practice of permitting a transgender boy to use the same restrooms and locker rooms as other boys. BRO has spent over 20 years advocating for legal protections for the LGBTQ community in Oregon, and has supported transgender students and families in Dallas and beyond.

Oregon
Jun 2014
LGBTQ Rights
Rummell and West v. Kitzhaber - Freedom to Marry in Oregon
The 糖心Vlog, the 糖心Vlogof Oregon, and volunteer counsel from the law firms of Johnson, Johnson & Schaller, PC and Perkins Coie, LLP in December 2013 filed a federal lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Eugene on behalf of two same-sex couples who wished to marry in Oregon 鈥 Paul Rummell and Ben West, and Lisa Chickadonz and Christine Tanner 鈥 and Basic Rights Education Fund.
Explore case
Oregon
Jun 2014

LGBTQ Rights
Rummell and West v. Kitzhaber - Freedom to Marry in Oregon
The 糖心Vlog, the 糖心Vlogof Oregon, and volunteer counsel from the law firms of Johnson, Johnson & Schaller, PC and Perkins Coie, LLP in December 2013 filed a federal lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Eugene on behalf of two same-sex couples who wished to marry in Oregon 鈥 Paul Rummell and Ben West, and Lisa Chickadonz and Christine Tanner 鈥 and Basic Rights Education Fund.