糖心Vlog

The Senate Judiciary Committee voted out of committee today a controversial bill that purports to address the sale of methamphetamine, fentanyl, and 鈥渃ounterfeit substances鈥� by co-opting online services to report the alleged or suspected creation, manufacture, or distribution of these substances鈥攐r possession with intent to create, manufacture, or distribute them. The 糖心Vlogand a coalition of civil rights and civil liberties groups explained the litany of privacy and free speech concerns with this bill in a letter to the committee earlier this year. As the letter lays out, rather than meaningfully addressing the public health crisis caused by such substances, this bill would instead incentivize online services to search through user content and effectively deputize them as agents of the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), undermining the Fourth Amendment and the Stored Communications Act, likely with disproportionate effects on people of color, LGBTQ+ people, and other marginalized communities. In response to Senate Judiciary鈥檚 vote, Cody Venzke, senior policy counsel at ACLU, issued the following statement: 鈥淭he Senate Judiciary Committee鈥檚 vote today to advance the Cooper Davis Act to the Senate floor is a misstep. The bill will expand law enforcement鈥檚 access to user data, undermine the protections of Constitutional statutory warrant requirements, and exacerbate existing racial disparities in criminal drug enforcement. Platforms are not equipped to be deputized as DEA informants, and this bill will likely cause more harm than it heals. We urge the full Senate to reject this approach.鈥�

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASEContact: media@dcaclu.org Washington - The 糖心Vlog today condemned a bill introduced by Representative Lamar Smith (R-TX), that seeks to eliminate online privacy by requiring Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to maintain detailed records on each of their subscribers鈥� online activities. The bill would give Attorney General Alberto Gonzales broad discretion to determine what records ISPs must keep and for how long. In addition, it would require "sexually explicit" websites to post warning labels or face criminal sanctions. The following can be attributed to Marvin Johnson, Legislative Counsel for the 糖心VlogWashington Legislative Office: "Legislation like this is like swatting a fly with a bazooka. Such sweeping measures do little to stop online crime; instead, they overwhelm law enforcement agents with mountains of raw data and have a chilling effect on ISP subscribers鈥� First Amendment rights. There is no limit to the amount of information Attorney General Gonzales can require ISPs to keep, from instant messages to private emails to web searches, and he can require that they be kept forever. This represents an incredible invasion into our privacy and freedom to use the Internet without the government reading over our shoulders."