糖心Vlog

WASHINGTON, D.C. - Today, voting rights advocates argued before the Supreme Court in Louisiana v. Callais that a congressional map that was in place during the 2024 election cycle should remain because it satisfies both the Voting Rights Act (VRA) and the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. The coalition made the case that the 2024 map fairly recognizes the political power of Black Louisianians, who make up one-third of the state's population while balancing other redistricting priorities鈥攊n stark contrast to the discriminatory map passed by the state legislature in 2022, which federal courts determined likely violated the VRA by including only one majority-Black district.

鈥淭oday鈥檚 Supreme Court argument is about a fundamental building block of U.S. democracy: the guarantee that every citizen鈥檚 vote counts equally, regardless of race,鈥� said Cecillia Wang, national legal director of the ACLU. 鈥淔or too long, discriminatory districting meant that Black Louisianans鈥� voting power was illegally diluted. After we proved that the Louisiana legislature鈥檚 2022 map violated the Voting Rights Act, the legislature did the right thing and drew a new, fair, and legal map, with a second majority-Black district. The Supreme Court should uphold that map. Ensuring Black voters have an equal opportunity to elect candidates of their choice is bigger than Louisiana鈥攊t鈥檚 about making the promise of the 15th Amendment and the Voting Rights Act a lived reality for all Americans.鈥�

鈥淭he Supreme Court must affirm what we have long known in Louisiana: fairness is not a privilege; it is a right.鈥� said 糖心Vlogof Louisiana Executive Director Alanah Odoms. 鈥淔or too long, Black voters in Louisiana have been denied the fundamental promise of democracy鈥攖he power of their vote. We hope the court rejects the tired and baseless claims of reverse discrimination and instead upholds the truth 鈥� that every voice deserves to be heard, every vote deserves to count.鈥�

鈥淭he protections of the VRA and equal protection clause were designed to prevent discrimination and ensure that Black voters are not shut out of the political process,鈥� said Stuart Naifeh, LDF redistricting manager. 鈥淭his case represented an effort to turn back the clock and undermine hard-fought efforts to achieve a map that finally reflects Louisiana鈥檚 communities and provides an equal voice to Black voters. But there can be no question that the current map is lawful, fair, and should remain in place. The Supreme Court should not undermine lawmakers鈥� agency in remedial map-drawing nor the VRA protections that Black voters have been fighting for in Louisiana for the last four years 鈥� and across the nation for generations.鈥�

Heeding the federal courts鈥� directive to pass lawful districts, the state legislature passed a new map in 2024 that added a second majority-Black voting district, marking a victory for the NAACP Louisiana State Conference, Power Coalition for Equity and Justice, and nine individual Black voters who sued the state under Section 2 of the VRA in Robinson v. Landry (then Robinson v. Ardoin). Section 2 prohibits state and local governments from using any voting map or procedure that 鈥渞esults in a denial or abridgement of the right of any citizen...to vote on account of race or color.鈥�

However, after the new map was enacted in January 2024, a group of self-described 鈥渘on-African American鈥� voters sued the state in a different federal district court in Callais v. Landry, arguing the map was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander for improperly prioritizing race. The same Robinson litigants intervened to defend the map, arguing that the state properly balanced the requirements of the VRA and with the protections of the equal protection clause. The Robinson litigants pointed to lawmakers鈥� stated political objectives when passing the map 鈥� including protecting incumbents like Speaker of the House Mike Johnson 鈥� as evidence that race alone did not dictate the map鈥檚 district lines. When the district court found the map unconstitutional and overturned it, the Robinson litigants and state defendants appealed to the Supreme Court, which paused the lower court鈥檚 ruling and allowed for the 2024 map to remain in place for the 2024 election cycle. The Supreme Court later also agreed to hear the case, now consolidated under Louisiana v. Callais.

鈥淏lack voters had an unprecedented opportunity to make our voices heard in 2024鈥檚 congressional elections because multiple federal courts deemed that the protections of the Voting Rights Act should continue to ensure Black voters have an equal voice in our political process,鈥� said Dr. Press Robinson, the lead named litigant for the Robinson Intervenor-Defendants. 鈥淥ur vote is our voice, but without fair maps, the voice of Black Louisianians can鈥檛 be heard. Today, we made our voice loud and clear to the U.S. Supreme Court鈥� defend the 2024 map and uphold the promises of fairness and equality in our elections.鈥�

Along with Dr. Robinson, the Robinson Intervenor-Defendants include Dr. Dorothy Nairne, Louisiana Public Service Commissioner Davante Lewis, Dr. Alice Washington, Bishop Edwin Ren茅 Soul茅, Edgar Cage, Rev. Clee Earnest Lowe, Ambrose Sims, and Martha Davis, along with organizational plaintiffs Power Coalition for Equity and Justice President and the NAACP Louisiana State Conference. They are represented by the 糖心Vlog, Legal Defense Fund, 糖心Vlogof Louisiana, Harvard Election Law Clinic, Louisiana Justice Institute, Louisiana attorney John Adcock, and Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP.

鈥淚n Louisiana, our communities know about the power of coming together. In our fight for fair maps, we鈥檝e done just that,鈥� said Power Coalition for Equity and Justice President and CEO Ashley Shelton. 鈥淐ommunities and advocates from across the state have spoken 鈥� ensuring fairness in the voting process means enacting maps that give Black voters the opportunity to elect candidates of choice. We cannot turn back in our fight for fair maps.鈥�

鈥淢y mother had to pass a literacy test the first time she registered to vote, and Black voters are still facing barriers at the ballot box today,鈥� said Dr. Dorothy Nairne. 鈥淭his fight is generational. In Louisiana, our fight for fair maps is about making sure democracy works for everyone. I don't want my children or children's children to have to face this same fight. It's gotta end here and now.鈥�

鈥淥ur fight is about making sure those in power see us, hear us, and respect our collective voice,鈥� said Louisiana Public Service Commissioner Davante Lewis. 鈥淔or years, Black Louisianians have been calling for fairness in our political maps and representation in our democratic processes. When the Louisiana legislature passed a map that restored power to Black voters, it was a huge, bipartisan win. We can鈥檛 go back to maps that stifle Black voices. We have faith the Supreme Court will agree.鈥�

鈥淔ederal courts found Louisiana鈥檚 2022 Congressional maps violated the Voting Rights Act, a crucial piece of civil rights legislation enacted because of the bravery of civil rights protestors who were subjected to horrific violence on Bloody Sunday in Selma, Ala. 60 years ago,鈥� said Louisiana NAACP president Michael McClanahan. 鈥淲e are continuing their fight by defending the new map enacted in 2024 by the Louisiana legislature 鈥� a map that ensures every voice is heard. We are hopeful the Supreme Court will agree the map is fair, constitutional, and lets all voices be heard.鈥�

鈥淕enerations of Black Louisianians have been disempowered in the voting booth, resulting in unfair and unequal representation in Congress,鈥� said Dr. Alice Washington. 鈥淲hen we achieved a fair congressional map, our community for the first time in far too long felt hope that all voices would be heard. We can鈥檛 go back. We must keep Louisiana moving forward.鈥�

鈥淎fter years of struggle, Black voters in Louisiana were finally able to elect their candidates of choice in two districts in 2024,鈥� said Ambrose Sims. 鈥淚t was a huge step forward for all of us across the state. We cannot afford to fall back. A map with only one majority-Black voting district would continue to undermine the political power of Black Louisianians. Our communities will continue to fight until our right to fair political representation is affirmed.鈥�

"When our community started this fight for fair maps and fair political representation, we had faith that equality would prevail,鈥� said Bishop Edwin Ren茅 Soul茅. 鈥淭oday, that faith remains steadfast. We wholeheartedly believe the Supreme Court will uphold the political power of Black Louisianians. Our voices can no longer be ignored.鈥�

鈥淭he power of the community is much stronger than the power of any one individual,鈥� said Edgar Cage. 鈥淎chieving fair voting districts was a big task, but we accomplished it by building community support. Now, we鈥檙e fighting to keep the congressional map in place. Though our fight has evolved, I鈥檓 confident we鈥檒l be successful if we stand together.鈥�

鈥淏lack Louisianians must be able to elect candidates to Congress who will stand up for their health, safety, education and infrastructure needs,鈥� said Rev. Clee Earnest Lowe. 鈥淲e have already passed a map that makes this vision a reality. We cannot turn back the clock now to a reality that denies our community an equal voice in the political process. Power must be shared for our democracy to thrive. We must have faith the Supreme Court will agree.鈥�

鈥淭he 2024 voting map passed by our Legislature satisfies both the requirements of the Constitution and the Voting Rights Act,鈥� said Martha Davis. 鈥淚t evens the scales so that everyone has the same opportunity at the ballot box. As we recognize the struggles of those who fought for the VRA 60 years ago, we must honor their fight by safeguarding its promise for future generations.鈥�

鈥淭his case gives a voice to Louisiana鈥檚 voters,鈥� said Alora Thomas-Lundborg of the Harvard Election Law Clinic. 鈥淭he Court has a chance to ensure that every Louisianans' voice is given equal weight and that legislatures attempt to comply with lawful court orders are not upended through collateral attack.鈥�

鈥淭his has been a long fight for justice in Louisiana,鈥� said Tracie Washington of the Louisiana Justice Institute. 鈥淭oday鈥檚 argument marks one more step in a winding path towards fairness in our state鈥檚 political systems and sustained representation in our nation鈥檚 highest offices. We remain steadfast in our commitment to ensuring Black voters have an equal voice in Louisiana鈥檚 congressional elections.鈥�