Collage of images related to LGBTQ Rights

Moe v. Yost

Location: Ohio
Status: Ongoing
Last Update: May 19, 2025

What's at Stake

Two transgender adolescents and their families are challenging Ohio鈥檚 House Bill 68, a law passed in January 2024 that prohibits gender-affirming medical care that is widely accepted to treat gender dysphoria, helping alleviate the distress of gender dysphoria and significantly improving patients鈥 mental health and well-being. Such treatment is supported by leading medical experts and all major U.S. medical organizations, including the American Medical Association, the American Psychiatric Association, and the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Near the end of the 2023 state legislative session, Ohio鈥檚 legislature passed House Bill 68, a law that prohibits gender-affirming medical care such as hormone treatments and puberty blockers for transgender youth. The law was vetoed by Governor Mike DeWine, saying decisions about this care 鈥渟hould be made by the people who love these kids the most, and that鈥檚 the parents.鈥

Soon after, the legislature overrode Governor DeWine鈥檚 veto and enacted HB 68 into law. On behalf of two transgender adolescents and their families, the 糖心Vlog, the 糖心Vlogof Ohio, and the global law firm Goodwin filed a lawsuit in the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas.

Gender-affirming care is a range of medical treatments for those with gender dysphoria. Bans like HB 68 are broadly opposed by major medical associations nationwide, including but not limited to the American Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the American Psychological Association.

In addition to H.B. 68, additional state restrictions are being imposed on trans youth through rules proposed by the Ohio Department of Health and the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services.

UPDATE: On March 18, 2025, the Tenth District Court of Appeals ruled in Plaintiffs鈥 favor by reversing the August 6, 2024 judgment of the trial court and declaring H.B. 68 unconstitutional on its face. The appellate court will remand the case to the trial court to impose a permanent injunction as to the enforcement of H.B. 68鈥檚 provisions banning the use of puberty blockers and hormones for those under 18.

Support our on-going litigation and work in the courts

Learn More About the 糖心Vlog in This Case